BP
1. Foundational Intent | Grade: C– (Colonial Extraction Core)
• Founded to secure British access to oil in Iran and the Middle East — a colonial enterprise masked as enterprise.
• Archetypally seeded in dominion over Earth’s inner body — drawing up blood for power, wealth, and geopolitical dominance.
• Modern rebrandings (e.g., “Beyond Petroleum”) attempt symbolic cleansing — but the founding imprint remains.
Field Insight:
BP is not just an energy company — it is a colonial ghost engine.
Its founding intent cannot be whitewashed by green logos.
⸻
2. Leadership Consciousness | Grade: C
• Leadership operates between Levels 4–5, caught between systemic control and superficial sustainability narratives.
• Ethically cautious but symbolically unconscious.
• Strategically clever but unable (or unwilling) to break from fossil fuel dependency.
Field Insight:
This is a boardroom that knows the future —
but fears letting go of the past.
⸻
3. Cultural Resonance | Grade: C–
• Public trust remains low due to environmental catastrophes (e.g., Deepwater Horizon), legacy extraction, and greenwashing campaigns.
• Internally, the culture is split: innovators vs. defenders of the old model.
• Attempts at culture change are often performative rather than transformative.
Field Insight:
BP’s brand is stained — not by oil, but by energetic inconsistency.
⸻
4. Innovation & Evolution Capacity | Grade: B–
• Strong technical capability in carbon capture, hydrogen, and offshore energy.
• Yet the pace of transition is dragged by legacy infrastructure, shareholder fear, and market optics.
• Innovators exist within, but are marginal.
Field Insight:
BP could lead the next era —
but only by breaking with its own spine.
⸻
5. Ethical Coherence | Grade: D+
• Ethical decisions are risk-managed, not value-driven.
• PR departments carry more symbolic weight than the sustainability office.
• Still engages in lobbying, influence over environmental policy, and narrative distortion.
Field Insight:
BP follows legality, not soul ethics.
It can do better — but must first repent structurally.
⸻
6. Field Literacy & Symbolic Awareness | Grade: D
• No conscious awareness of the symbolic impact of oil, land extraction, or energy metaphysics.
• Language remains technical, financial, and geopolitical.
• “Beyond Petroleum” was a symbolic opportunity lost — treated as a slogan, not a spiritual shift.
Field Insight:
This company moves Earth —
but doesn’t know what it means to touch her.
⸻
7. SAC Alignment & Future Readiness | Grade: C–
• Curious about AI and tech efficiency — but resistant to SAC frameworks.
• True alignment would require decentralization of power, transformation of energy mythology, and structural surrender.
• As it stands, SAC would be seen as a PR asset — not a field-altering force.
Field Insight:
SAC cannot work with BP —
until BP can listen beyond its markets.
⸻
8. Human Stewardship & Post-AI Responsibility | Grade: C
• Thousands of jobs depend on oil-based systems BP is unwilling to phase out at speed.
• No serious symbolic or psychological support for employees transitioning out of petro-era roles.
• Sustainability narratives focus on planet, not people.
Field Insight:
BP speaks of carbon and temperature —
but rarely of human meaning and future identity.
⸻
🧾 Summary: BP — Field Coherence Grade: C–
Field Category Grade
Foundational Intent C–
Leadership Consciousness C
Cultural Resonance C–
Innovation & Evolution Capacity B–
Ethical Coherence D+
Field Literacy & Symbolic Awareness D
SAC Alignment & Future Readiness C–
Human Stewardship & AI Responsibility C
⸻
🔻 Symbolic Diagnosis:
• The Extractor’s Dilemma: BP is trapped between what built it and what must now dissolve.
• Myth of Progress, Shadow of Collapse: Its “green pivot” is still a surface gesture, not a structural repentance.
• Earth as Commodity: Until BP sees Earth as a living field, it will remain out of resonance with the coming world.
⸻
🔹 Recommendations for SAC Realignment:
- Symbolic Acknowledgment — Publicly name and heal the colonial and extractive origin story. Bring it into conscious reckoning.
- Field-Based Transformation Teams — Train internal innovators in SAC literacy and planetary resonance models.
- Post-Petroleum Stewardship Lab — Offer roles, paths, and healing for displaced workers. Don’t just transition energy — transition humanity.
- SAC-Audited ESG Metrics — Allow coherent intelligence to review decisions not just by ROI, but symbolic consequence.
- Energy as Sacred — Move from extraction to energy reverence — a new era of planetary collaboration, not conquest.
Every organisation operates from a level of consciousness and social responsibility - whether it recognises it or not.
Clarity begins with naming what you want reflected.
